I apologise, we feel bad, but there's no trailer available. ~Ed.
While the inevitable comparisons with other fantasy films will ensue, The Golden Compass is better than the early Potters, beats Narnia hands down, and easily surpasses the recent Stardust. It loses something in the translation from book to screen, but remains an exciting adventure with some fantastic sights.
The Golden Compass is an adventurous tale of young Lyra who leaves her refined Oxford home to travel to the ice-bound north, where her uncle, Lord Asriel, is conducting heretical experiments to open up a gateway into a parallel world. It's a savage land, where armoured bears prowl, beautiful witches fly through the skies, and evil British scientists are conducting horrible experiments on children.
The parallel world setting is magnificent, and their London is a steam-punk art-deco metropolis. Life here is also different. Every human being has their soul represented as an animal that wanders beside them, called a daemon. Children's daemons change, and only settle as the humans reach adulthood. There is a very interesting subtext here – it's bad to touch someone else's daemon, or wander too far from your own – but the film doesn't explore this in huge detail.
Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings trilogy was a successful fantasy adaptation because it felt fresh and original. It was like nothing else out there. Unfortunately, The Golden Compass doesn't have quite the same panache or conviction. It looks great, but there is something too literal about the translation from book to screen. It never transcends the source material, so there is little to move audiences unfamiliar with the story.
And without the context of the two sequels, the deeper meanings and philosophical questions that were posed by the books are largely left unanswered here. Characters are thinner, and their goals aren't quite as clear-cut. Add in the fact that the book's final chapters have been shifted to the beginning of a potential second movie, and you've got one very underwhelming ending (although, conversely, it made me rabidly excited about the sequel).
But in spite of all that, for my money, this is as good a young person's fantasy as you're going to get. The visual effects are very impressive, particularly the animation used to bring the polar bears to life. You can almost feel their weight during a brutal bear fight. Their king, Ragnar Sturlusson, is a scary creation indeed.
Performances, too, are all good. Particularly Dakota Blue Richards who plays Lyra with a plucky artful-dodger type charm. Daniel Craig plays Lord Asriel as Ernest Shackleton meets Indiana Jones - half oxford professor, half artic explorer. Nicole Kidman is creepy as the cunning Mrs Coulter.
The Golden Compass certainly provides a decent start to the fantasy trilogy, and we can only hope that the filmmakers are allowed to take more risks with the sequels.
By Andrew Hedley, Flicks.co.nz
Just let the kid in you enjoy I really enjoyed most of the content There are one hell of a lot worse fantasy movies out there
Not worth seeing at the movies
Movies are not supposed to be a permanent release from reality.
When I saw this movie i was bored out of mind. I mean the story was impossible to understand or keep up with at that matter. Everyones saying that this movie is so good and that is why I saw it. I think my cousins wasted their money on a piece of junk. They also wasted their time. It was worse than Fools Gold witch was terrible by the way. Im surprised that people liked the movie. Its like paying someone to kill you. THERES NO PLOT LINE!
SUSPEND ANY JUDGEMENT,SIT BACK WITH POPCORN,CHOC ICE AND DRINK AND LET THE KID IN YOU ENJOY A ROLLICKING GOOD YARN. MOVIES ARE ENTERTAINMENT AND MEANT BE A RELEASE FROM REALITY FOR A COUPLE OF HOURS.
A darker, deeper fantasy epic than the "Rings" trilogy, "The Chronicles of Narnia" or the "Potter" films. It springs from the same British world of quasi-philosophical magic, but creates more complex villains and poses more intriguing questions. As a visual experience, it is superb. As an escapist fantasy, it is challenging....
A crushing disappointment for fans and a scuppered opportunity for a cinematic event. That the first book has been so mishandled doesn’t bode well for the (already greenlit) more complicated ones to come...
Me, I just think it blows. What does it matter if you spend millions on a movie - love the talking, battling bears! - if the effects are cheesy, the story runs off on tangents and after watching the movie fail utterly to be the next Lord of the Rings, you just want to go home...
This is what happens when filmmakers bend over backwards to try to please everyone. Nobody's really happy...
A "soft" epic, a film touching on childhood fantasies with sturdy, unwavering characters driven to evil or good. More "Harry Potter," in other words, than "Beowulf."...
We've been told the NZ release date for this flick is Wednesday, 26th Dec 2007.
Release date: December 26th 2007.
We haven't received times for this movie in this location yet. However these are updated as cinemas announce them, so check back soon. Hopefully the lovely cinemas in your location will choose to play it shortly. ~Ed.