Out Now On-Demand
Chadwick Boseman reprises his titular role in the Marvel Cinematic Universe's 18th film. Directed by Sundance Grand Jury Prize-winner Ryan Coogler (Creed).
When Black Panther's leadership is threatened by two of his foes who join forces, he must fight back along with the C.I.A. and the Dora Milaje. Erik Killmonger (Michael B. Jordan) has been revealed to be one of said foes.
- Ryan Coogler('Creed', 'Fruitvale Station')
Action, Drama, Science Fiction, Blockbuster
Rating: M Violence
With his regal demeanour, noble disposition, and unquestionable ability to kick an ass or 20, Chadwick Boseman’s T’Challa proved himself worthy of the Black Panther suit in Captain America: Civil War. Had his solo film expanded on these three qualities, while delivering the necessary fights and funnies that define the Marvel Cinematic Universe, it would have made for a good film. Ryan Coogler’s Black Panther does much more.
Like most of the films in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, the plot runs by a tried-and-true blueprint. This time, it follows the footsteps of the first Thor with story beats surrounding royalties, loyalties, betrayals, outcasts and family secrets that feel familiar (sometimes predictable). However, they play naturally to the majestic and technologically advanced world of Wakanda.
If anyone deserves to retire as kings and queens, it’s the art department. There’s so much creativity displayed in the makeup, costuming, sets, and sci-fi designs that a single watch cannot absorb it all. From the striking attire of the Dora Milaje warriors to the sand-like magnetic thingy-ma-bobs that power Wakandan tech, every detail adds wonderment to a world that imagines an African culture gifted with near-unlimited resources and untainted by colonialism.
The poisons of history play a big part in Black Panther – not just with colonialism, but with any past act that later proves to be problematic. This is what powers Michael B Jordan’s Killmonger, a vicious yet sympathetic adversary with enough depth to make him one of the more memorable villains in the MCU.
However, the true knockout stars are Lupita Nyong’o as Wakandan spy Nakia and Danai Gurira as Dora Milaje general Okoye. They’re given multiple times to shine using both their heroic fists and their stand-up comedy routines while sticking to their own rounded subplots.
Weirdly enough, Get Out’s Oscar-nominated star Daniel Kaluuya ends up falling a little flat as commander W’Kabi, using a casual ‘did you just fart?’ face for almost every confrontation. His relationship with Okoye also seems non-existent until the film coughs it up during an otherwise exciting climax. But those are minor complaints for a film that feels gargantuan in almost every other way.
Los Angeles Times
New York Times
Total Film (UK)
Stuff.co.nz (Graeme Tuckett)
Listener (Russell Baillie)
Newsroom.co.nz (Darren Bevan)
Black Panther excels in presenting a unique central character with a memorable supporting cast. The soundtrack/score is without question, one of the better ones of Marvel's. The Killmonger serves as a middling villain - he's very compelling but a little cliched in motives. Andy Serkis, also a highlight.
Marvel's history of diversity and inclusiveness shines in the Black Panther. So when I heard that Marvel was releasing a Black Panther movie I had grave doubts. I found myself thinking "DON'T MESS THIS UP!"
So here we are, one month after it's release and the Black Panther is still screening an garnering praise. Well deserved praise.
Is this a perfect movie? Of course not. Armor with built in nipples? Again? When WILL they learn?
As for those CGI rhinos. I'm can live with that. After all, rhinos are not as easy going as elephants. Hand-reared rhinos that are tame enough to cover with motion capture dots and lead around in front of a green screen or in a set are few. Or non-existent. Seriously. Don't mess with rhinos.
As for the pacing of the movie, it's repeated moments and the length and plausibility of the actions scenes, well that's just a matter of personal taste. You'll never please everyone.
What pleased me most about this movie was the way I saw the building of the Black Panther universe. Broad strokes are used. Nothing is over explained. The purpose of an all woman royal body guard is not touched on. The different responses of his people to their king when he is or is not wearing his mask was so lightly used it was hardly noticeable. And I am deeply thankful to see not one hint of the Intergalactic Empire of Wakanda!
I dearly loved the scene where the C.I.A agent, ever so accustomed to being taken ever so seriously was shut up so firmly it rocked him on his heels! So much comic history in one delightful moment. You didn't have to be a comic book reader to get that one. I wasn't the only one laughing my arse off.
The cast was first rate. This is very much an ensemble movie. I couldn't single out an individual for top honours. Time after time I saw hints that the actors/script writers/director knew the history of a comic series that goes back to 1966 and thus has a rich history to draw upon.
I exited this movie both hugely relieved and grinning from ear to ear.
In general you might say there are two ways to review a movie. In its cultural and historical context, and as a movie. Often it’s hard to disentangle the two. It can take years. Decades.
Take Wonder Woman, a perfectly good action movie, that falls apart in its final act, with a pretty silly villain. A solid three-star movie, that entertains and offers heaps of fun. But, as a long-overdue cultural “happening” its importance as a female superhero movie led to many critics heaping praise that in retrospect likely owes more to the woman at its centre than to cinematic wonder.
Another case in point is Black Panther. On Monday 19th February, after the movie smashed various US domestic box office opening records, former First Lady Michelle Obama Tweeted:
“Congrats to the entire #blackpanther team. Because of you, young people will finally see superheroes that look like them on the big screen. I loved this movie and I know it will inspire people of all backgrounds to dig deep and find the courage to be heroes of their own stories.”
Five stars for relevance. But is it a good movie? In a word – yes.
Fun, exciting, fresh (in terms of the Marvel Cinematic Universe at least) and downright entertaining. But, solely as a movie, it’s over long, unnecessarily repeats key scenes (the waterfall fight sequences being a stand-out example) and contains more than its fair share of wonky CGI (yeah, armoured rhinos, I’m looking at you!)
But, it has arguably the greatest “villain” (Michael B. Jordan fantastic as Killmonger) since the bad guy in Captain America: Civil War, a rounded three-dimensional human being with relatable motives, if questionable means to achieve his ends.
Best of all, it’s not a solo movie about one central protagonist, it’s a team movie with an ensemble cast, and it’s actually about something more than superhero punch-ups and CGI explosions.
Taking up his mantle as new king of Wakanda, following his father’s death in Civil War, T’Challa (Chadwick Boseman) is surprisingly one of the least interesting characters in a film that introduces not just a full cast of supporting characters, but a whole new world.
Yeah, ok, Wakanda veers between a lively, less-dystopian version of Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner cityscapes, a colourful utopian version of Fritz Lang’s Metropolis. The subtext ain’t too hard to see here. Imagine an Africa free from history, an Africa without slavery, white imperialism and colonial rule.
Director Ryan Coogler presents an Edenic vision of a free, science-driven culture that has embraced its tribal heritage and fused the two, with the fictional ‘Vibranium’ replacing oil as the economic driver.
Coogler has moved from the riveting drama of Fruitvale Station, to the surprisingly superb Rocky spin-off Creed, and now delivers on the blockbuster front. With a slow, evenly paced first act, leading to the action pay off of the second and third climactic battles, Black Panther is blockbusting popcorn entertainment with a brain, and the chief villain in its sights is colonialism.
Black Panther, King T’Challa, at first supports isolationism, wanting to keep Wakanda secret and safe from the outside world. By the end of the movie, his position has changed and the new King wants to share his people’s advances with the world, much as the first Iron Man ended with a press conference and Tony Stark’s frank admission: “I am Iron Man,” so Black Panther ends with an outstretched hand.
The supposed villain, Killmonger is all for taking the advantages of Wakandan science and using them to climb to the top of the World-power pile. His vision is nothing short of an uprising of the poor, the oppressed and the progeny of the formerly enslaved.
Explicitly at one point he says he wishes to be buried in the sea, where so many of the stolen people of Africa died at the hands of slave traders: “Bury me in the ocean like my ancestors that jumped from the ships because they knew death was better than bondage.”
Too political? Not if you read the original Black Panther comics and remember not only the context in which they were created, but take a few seconds to think about the title. Black Panther. Yeah, Killmonger hails from the Californian city of Oakland, where the Black Panther Party was established in 1966.
It’s this subtext that makes Black Panther so important. In all other black superhero movies the black hero has ultimately been reliant on, or a side-kick to, a white hero. In Blade, Wesley Snipe’s Daywalker vampire relied on Kris Kristofferson’s Whistler, his white friend and aid. In Captain America and Iron Man, Falcon relies on Tony Stark’s suit technology for his power and on Steve Rogers to lead the team. Heck, even Samuel L Jackson as Frozone in Pixar animation The Incredibles played second-fiddle to a white hero.
Reading too much into it? Ok, well what about all those references to James Bond’s gadget shop, in which this version of Q is a young, black woman, Shuri (played by Letitia Wright) Wakanda’s chief of technology and T’Challa’s cheeky younger sister, who says, when surprised by Martin Freeman: “Don’t scare me like that, colonizer!”
Yup, throughout Black Panther, women of colour are represented as strong, independent and highly skilled. Danai Gurira rocks as General Okoye, and there’s a lot of fun in the line about Wakanda’s “Grace Jones-looking” all-female militia. The costumes, make-up and art direction for Wakanda and its inhabitants are fabulous – vibrant, colourful and simply stunning to see on the big screen.
Yes, Wakanda is a fictional city, because Africa’s is a history interrupted and invaded, but in Black Panther Ryan Coogler and his team of top-notch collaborators have created a fiction capable of not just entertaining, but inspiring.
If that’s not worth an extra star I don’t know what is.
Marvel is King
Yep yep yep another marvel masterpiece, they know how to entertain and delight. I mean it was 'avengers' universe I was so going to see this even if the reviews had been rubbish. It deserves every accolade it has gotten. Its so stunning just the sheer visual world of Wakanda is enticing. The male characters are all very fine but this is a film where the female roles just soar. Completely entranced with Lupita Nyong'o, Letitia Wright and Danai Gurira. Its non- stop and unstoppable. If you like your action flicks, its a must see.
Black Panther Review
One of marvel's best
Black panther is the 18th film in the marvel cinematic universe, and once again marvel hits home. It has a stellar cast with all actors fitting their roles perfectly, and some deep underlying messages that all make for an amazing experience.
Good, but not great.
It's thought-provoking, action packed and unique in themes & style - however lacking an intriguing plot, holding it from being a spectacle.
Mostly lives up to the hype
There was a lot of hype about this movie before I saw it, so expectations were high. For the most part it lived up to them - the movie was well-acted, had good action scenes, and beautiful scenery. The stereotypical story-lines and over-the-top tropes were typical of a superhero movie, so I can't hold those against this film.
Just another Marvel superhero blockbuster. Fun action sequences. Michael B. Jordan is great as Erik Killmonger, one of the best MCU antagonists and a far more interesting character than T'Challa (Black Panther). I enjoyed Andy Serkis' goofy performance as Ulysses Klaue. The plot takes a while to kick in. Just a personal preference, but the funnier, less serious Marvel films (e.g. THOR: RAGNAROK, GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY) are more entertaining than the Marvel films with less humorous, more dramatic tones. Enjoyed the movie enough, but it's not the second coming of Christ like everyone says it is.
Good, but not great
There are two ways of looking at “Black Panther”: as a Marvel / big studio movie and as a social-cultural event. I’ll ignore the latter aspect in this review.
As a movie in the Marvel superhero genre, “Black Panther” is disappointing given all the hype that’s accompanied it. True, it’s got several things going for it. To be fair, the first three-quarters are pretty good . There’s a very good extended car chase sequence, which manages to be both exciting and amusing. The back story and plot line are interesting and fresh. Wakanda city is a marvel of set design, alluring and imaginative. The early action sequences are supple and make full use of the big screen and the swooping camerawork. The exterior colour photography is great (some interiors are a bit murky). There’s some fine acting from Michael Jordan as the hero’s virile , conflicted and intense brother, as well as a scene-stealing performances from Andy Serkis as a South African villain and a perky, cheerful and likeable Letitia Wright as the hero’s smart young sister. And the native African music that features on the soundtrack was tremendously appealing -a pity there wasn’t more; the rest of the music is just so-so. And most unusually for a Marvel or indeed most big-budget movies, “Black Panther” raises some substantive issues that have great resonance today: racial pride and prejudice, colonialism, refugees, and (very cleverly) the obligations of richer nations towards the world’s poor and dispossessed. Another bonus was the movie’s message urging racial and cultural inclusiveness.
So why was I ultimately disappointed in the movie? Essentially, the longer it goes on for, the more its faults and weaknesses become clear. Like all Marvel movies (except 2017’s Thor) it’s twenty minutes too long; too many scenes are redundant especially after the 100 minute mark. It’s also increasingly repetitive; a waterfall duel near the start and consequent coronation ritual are both repeated an hour later.
Anther problem is that the movie’s hero becomes rather bland and boring after an hour ; the sort of nice, decent guy you’d like to see your sister marry but rather too earnest and self-righteous. In fact, Chadwick Boseman as the villainous Killmonger, forceful, clever, resourceful, a bit of a charmer in a dangerous way, would have made a better hero. And the special effects are a strange mix of the impressive and the clumsy. In particular, the CGI and blue screen in some sequences, notably the waterfall / clifftop location, are pathetic. They resemble something out of 1970s. The shots of various skycraft moving through the sky are similarly 1970’s era.
By the two hour mark this movie starts to disintegrate. Its tome has become increasingly uncertain and desperate. A bit of James Bond here, some cultural comment there, five minutes of stunning character revelation, flashbacks, some witty backtalk as in Thor 2017. Worst of all is the final showdown on a rather too obvious CGI manufactured east African veldt. This goes on and on, not helped by staccato editing and fake looking explosions, unconvincing fighting, all interrupted by the disastrous appearance of a rampaging herd of digital rhinos enacted in metallic sheaths at which a gust of derisive laughter swept the audience around me.