Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald

Coming Soon On-Demand 13 March 2019

Who will change the future?

Eddie Redmayne returns to take on Gellert Grindelwald (Johnny Depp) in the second instalment of J.K. Rowling's fantasy adventure series.

Gellert Grindelwald has escaped imprisonment and has begun gathering followers to his cause—elevating wizards above all non-magical beings. The only one capable of putting a stop to him is the wizard he once called his closest friend, Albus Dumbledore (Jude Law). However, Dumbledore will need to seek help from the wizard who had thwarted Grindelwald once before, his former student Newt Scamander (Redmayne).


Directed by

  • David Yates('Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them', 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1', 'Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince')

Written by

Adventure, Fantasy, Blockbuster


Rating: M Violence


Like all Pottheads, I am a lover of canonical whakapapa. You might be delighted to know, as I was, that the grandson of Newt Scamander, Rolf, marries Luna Lovegood, for instance. Or that Nymphadora Tonks is Bellatrix Lestrange’s niece. It’s with the same fascination I love to trace the British royal family tree to see how many branches loop back into the main trunk (Queen Liz and Philip are basically cousins, you guys).

So it’s for this reason I was disappointed that the first Fantastic Beastsentry, enjoyable as it was, had few recognisable names. No glimpse of Neville’s grandparents on vacation, or a teenaged Professor Flitwick.

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald is much better for scratching that itch. In fact, the greater your knowledge of the complicated family lines of the Potter universe, the better.

The new and familiar get to mingle more freely in the second entry thanks to new locations—Paris and other parts of Europe, bringing us closer to Hogwarts and names we recognise (if not their young faces).

The taciturn magizoologist Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) is thrust once more into the ill-fitting role of hero, this time with the guidance of a young Albus Dumbledore (Jude Law) who thankfully subscribes more to Richard Harris’ (Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone) gentler interpretation of the character rather than his inappropriately shouty successor, Michael Gambon.

Newt is reunited with his No-maj baker friend Jacob Kowalski, as well as sisters Queenie and Tina Goldstein. Of special note is Daniel Fogler as Kowalski, ostensibly the comedic relief of the franchise (who garners the biggest laugh of the film with a single word), but who delivers a moving, full-range performance.

One of my favourite things about the Beasts films is that they’re as much for the animal-mad kids that want to be zookeepers and marine biologists when they grow up as Potter fans. The beasts are incredible, the full realisation of CGI and AI and 3D rendering and all those wonderful things we already take for granted. Imagination literally runs wild across the screen.

Newt’s affinity for his beasts had me biting my bottom lip far more often than any terror being wreaked by the evil Gellert Grindelwald (Johnny Depp). But that’s because I was one of those marine biologist kids, I suppose.

Weirdly my hatred of Johnny Depp works for the film—movie baddies are meant to be loathed, right? But I still despised every moment he was on screen and wished for a different actor in the role. Abuse allegations aside, there are better actors with less preposterous British accents.

The film is set in the 1920s and judging by previous literature, parallels with Gellert Grindelwald’s and Adolf Hitler’s rise to power aren’t incidental. With that in mind, some of the scenes involving his rallying of new followers are genuinely chilling.

It’s starting to pack some of the darker emotional punch of the original Potters, just on that satisfying knife’s edge where you can enjoy the fantasy universe but also start to feel genuine grief and fear for the characters (I’m still howling about Fred Weasley). Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald gave me much more reason to hope for that special, immersive experience than the first one did.



An unfocused, overwhelming and ultimately numbing sprawl that seems to drag on forever.

New York Times


Rowling has surrendered to her maximalist tendencies and so cluttered up the story that you spend far too much time trying to untangle who did what to whom and why.

Empire (UK)


The second chapter in JK Rowling's five-part story, it's a film stuffed with characters, big moments and impressive spectacle but still feels bizarrely underpowered.

Los Angeles Times


It offers up dazzling feats of sorcery and realms of wonderment and manages to conjure the very opposite of magic.

The Guardian


The architectural detail of JK Rowling's creativity is as awe-inspiring as ever.

TimeOut (New York)


With its callbacks to the Potter universe and a lovely eye for detail, The Crimes of Grindelwald has bags of intermittent charm and a warm familiarity. But too often, it feels like a beast that's been overburdened.

Hollywood Reporter


That the film remains enticing despite its evolving, still-pallid hero speaks to Rowling's storytelling strengths.

Variety (USA)


"Fantastic Beasts" assumes a similar level of engagement with its swollen dramatis personae, without allowing the time or putting in the work to earn it.

NZ Herald (Francesca Rudkin)


For those already locked into her [JK Rowling's] Wizarding World, you won't mind the length and occasionally confusing scenes and will already be theorising about what happens next. (Graeme Tuckett)


If you're a true fan, these are the moments you live for. For the rest of us, maybe getting there a bit quicker and with a few less diversions, would have been appreciated.

Lessons on evil.

This is what JK Rowling does so very well. She take all the familiar elements, tropes stereotypes and weaves them together with charm and intelligence to tell her story.

Right along side the whimsical world of magic, the humorous touches, the standard romantic relationships, the hero/ine types is a thinly disguised history lesson that points straight at today's world.

I doubt many of the younger people in the audience would have recognized the reference to racism and American's segregation ,so-called, miscegenation laws. Nor would many have caught the direct references to the rise of fascism in Germany. As for Johnny Depp's chillingly likeable (at times) Grindelwald, a timely reminder that Hitler was a charismatic leader and inspiring public speaker. Here also, a tale of what happens when governments abuse their power and treat the people as the enemy. Driving the vulnerable straight into the waiting arms of evil.

Yet it's all here. Tied up with a pretty ribbon. Acted out intelligently by a first rate ensemble cast. A lesson on how very easy it is to slide into disaster. What happens if we don't watch those with power over us, those who would move us with fear and, above all, what happens when we don't watch ourselves.

As for the die-hard Potter-verse fans. This film has an abundance of references to the "future". Some obvious others for the detail obsessed who remember everything and always want more.

Contrary to some, I found this a strong stand alone movie as well as a brilliantly crafted second act. I was riveted throughout and left the theatre eager for more.

A beautiful mess.

It certainly has some spectacle and magic in it, but that doesn't compensate for its messy writing and mildly interesting, overly convoluted plot(s).

Really great as expected four and 1/2 stars

The movie carried on with all of the wonderful exhilaration, writing, characters, discoveries and pure magic that the first film, Potter films and books had. It was a dark film at times much like the Potter late-middle books. There were new and marvelous creatures and there special relationship to Newt ( Redmayne so good) was remarkable. Jude Laws was a marvelous Dumbledore reserved, humourous and powerful! I think the acting, as always was 90% superlative, wanting a bit more subtly from Credence perhaps, “is he always morose? Was delighted Depp held his power beautifully in this ensemble context. Will be back to see it again. NOT TO BE MISSED. Bring on the next!

Just a stepping stone for the actual crimes of Grindelwald

Sure there's a nice callback to the Philosopher's stone, but sadly this movie leaves too many stones unturned. Unlike the first FBAWTF film, this movie does not hold-up as a standalone narrative. Crammed with subplots, accessory characters, and some characters that are sadly just wasted, the crimes of Grindelwald seem like they've all been saved for the next movie this film is clearly leading up to. Great to see some of my favourite characters again from the first movie, and always love revisiting the world of Harry Potter and seeing the magic on-screen, but some of J.K. Rowling's novel-writing magic clearly got a bit lost in translation, with some frankly confusing character arcs